On 3/11/2024 8:34 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> @@ -133,11 +133,13 @@ static int pdr_register_listener(struct pdr_handle *pdr,
>       req.enable = enable;
>       strscpy(req.service_path, pds->service_path, sizeof(req.service_path));
>  
> +     mutex_lock(&pdr->lock);
>       ret = qmi_send_request(&pdr->notifier_hdl, &pds->addr,
>                              &txn, SERVREG_REGISTER_LISTENER_REQ,
>                              SERVREG_REGISTER_LISTENER_REQ_LEN,
>                              servreg_register_listener_req_ei,
>                              &req);
> +     mutex_unlock(&pdr->lock);
>       if (ret < 0) {
>               qmi_txn_cancel(&txn);
>               return ret;
> 

Hi Dmitry,

What is the reason for taking the pdr lock here? The addr struct passed
into qmi_send_request is from the pdr_service. I think this is different
from the pdr_handle we are protecting in the other parts of the patch.

Thanks,
Chris

Reply via email to