On 4/3/2025 8:21 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 03/04/2025 14:03, Gokul Sriram Palanisamy wrote:
>> From: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmani...@quicinc.com>
>>
>> Enable nodes required for q6 remoteproc bring up.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmani...@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Gokul Sriram Palanisamy <gokul.srira...@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi 
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> index db69bff41afa..11a1849ec50f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi
>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>   * IPQ9574 SoC device tree source
>>   *
>>   * Copyright (c) 2020-2021 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> - * Copyright (c) 2023-2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights 
>> reserved.
>> + * Copyright (c) 2023-2025, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights 
>> reserved.
>>   */
>>  
>>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,apss-ipq.h>
>> @@ -226,6 +226,11 @@ smem@4aa00000 {
>>                      hwlocks = <&tcsr_mutex 3>;
>>                      no-map;
>>              };
>> +
>> +            q6_region: wcss@4ab00000 {
>> +                    reg = <0x0 0x4ab00000 0x0 0x2b00000>;
>> +                    no-map;
>> +            };
>>      };
>>  
>>      soc: soc@0 {
>> @@ -1473,6 +1478,36 @@ top_glue-critical {
>>                              };
>>                      };
>>              };
>> +
>> +            q6v5_wcss: remoteproc@cd00000 {
>> +                    compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-wcss-sec-pil";
>> +                    reg = <0x0cd00000 0x4040>;
> So this obviously was never built tested :/
>
> I don't understand why bindings and DTS is being changed after half a
> year. You got already review and what you sent supposed to be complete.
> Now, half a year later, you change both bindings and DTS thus:
> 1. What was the point of reviewing it that time? I will skip reviewing
> next time and wait till your patchsets reach v4 or v8 and review only
> then. This is not the first time for IPQ patches. It is actually pattern.
>
> 2. How released hardware can change within this timeframe?

The hardware/firmware hasn't changed. Will keep the Q6 DTB changes
separately outside
this series to make it clear and repost V5.

Regards,

Gokul


Reply via email to