> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2026 1:08 AM
> To: Z.Q. Hou <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Frank Li <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: imx_rproc: add lost DRAM range for i.MX93
>
> [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is
> important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> On Sat, 9 May 2026 at 05:54, Zhiqiang Hou <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > From: Hou Zhiqiang <[email protected]>
> >
> > The M33 DRAM view of 256MB ranges 0x[a,b]0000000 are mapped to
> > 0xa0000000 of A55 mapping view.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c index 7f54322244aca..175c2d3099794
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> > @@ -198,6 +198,9 @@ static const struct imx_rproc_att
> imx_rproc_att_imx93[] = {
> > { 0x80000000, 0x80000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > { 0x90000000, 0x80000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> >
> > + { 0xA0000000, 0xA0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > + { 0xB0000000, 0xA0000000, 0x10000000, 0 },
> > +
>
> Based on what this patch does, I'm not sure the word "lost" in the subject is
> accurate. Would something like "missing" better?
Thanks a lot for the correcting, updated in V2.
Thanks,
Zhiqiang
