> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] mailbox: imx: Forward the timeout/ > error in imx_mu_generic_tx() > > On 2026-06-26 16:23:49 [+0800], Peng Fan wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2026 at 09:44:09AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej > Siewior wrote: > > >On 2026-06-22 19:24:00 [+0800], Peng Fan wrote: > > >> We may need to use atomic API for TXDB_V2. For the patchset > itself, > > >> it looks good to me. > > >> > > >> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]> > > > > > >Thank you. Is there anything you want me to do or is this series > good > > >as-is? > > > > If you would like to address the AI reported issue further, you may > > update readl_poll_timeout to readl_poll_timeout_atomic. > > What about the timeout value? Keep it as-is or reduce to?
Let's keep it as-is. Thanks, Peng. > > > From the fix on error return, this patch is ok to me, and the series is > good. > > Thanks. > > > Thanks, > > Peng > > > > > Sebastian
