On Wed, 2 Sept 2026 at 14:12, Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 at 11:55, Wolfram Sang
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Every MFIS instance has a block of hardware spinlocks. Add support for
> > them. Gen4 has only one instance, so the base_id is always 0. Gen5 has
> > multiple instances, so the base_id has to be encoded in the info
> > description. Also being a provider, a hwspinlock-private header needs
> > to be included. Work to refactor the headers is on-going, but will need
> > many preparational steps. Until then, we need to live with the special
> > include.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v2:
> > * dropped patch 1 because Geert already queued it
> > * add comment that flex array must be last (Geert)
> > * calc local_id in a less scary way (Geert)
>
> Thanks for the update!
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
>
> Any feedback from the hwspinlock people? Can I queue this in
> renesas-devel?
Queuing in renesas-devel for v7.4.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
