Hi Simon,
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Simon Horman
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Make use of ARCH_RENESAS in place of ARCH_SHMOBILE.
>
> This is part of an ongoing process to migrate from ARCH_SHMOBILE to
> ARCH_RENESAS the motivation for which being that RENESAS seems to be a more
> appropriate name than SHMOBILE for the majority of Renesas ARM based SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
While this patch is correct from a technic point of view...
> ---
> * Based on the next branch of Vinod's slave-dma tree
> ---
> drivers/dma/sh/Kconfig | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/sh/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/sh/Kconfig
> index f32c430eb16c..6e0685f1a838 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/sh/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/Kconfig
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ config RENESAS_DMA
>
> config SH_DMAE_BASE
> bool "Renesas SuperH DMA Engine support"
> - depends on SUPERH || ARCH_SHMOBILE || COMPILE_TEST
> + depends on SUPERH || ARCH_RENESAS || COMPILE_TEST
... I'm wondering if we should just drop ARCH_SHMOBILE here.
The only driver for an ARM SoC using this (SH_DMAE_R8A73A4), is not fully
enabled in DT, and probably never will, so I think we can just drop that
driver, too.
Of course all of that can be done later.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
