Hi Wolfram,
On 04/01/2016 04:36 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Hi Guenter,
+static bool nowayout = WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT;
+module_param(nowayout, bool, S_IRUGO);
Sure you want this parameter readable ? No problem with me, but it is unusual,
so I figure it is worth asking.
No reason, will stick to the usual case.
+static void rwdt_write(struct rwdt_priv *priv, u32 val, unsigned reg)
Please use 'unsigned int' throughout.
Can do. May I ask why?
There are people changing unsigned -> unsigned int with coccinelle scripts.
Besides that, checkpatch warns about it.
Sure, I know, checkpatch is just a script, I know that story, but I don't
want to have to deal with the inevitable follow-up patches.
+ rwdt_write(priv, 65536 - wdev->timeout * priv->clks_per_sec, RWTCNT);
+
Just wondering, does reading RWTCNT return the remaining timeout ?
If so, you could easily implement WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT.
I assume you mean GETTIMELEFT. Tried that, seems to work.
Yes, sorry.
Thanks,
Guenter
function. In other words, you can just drop rwdt_set_timeout() entirely.
Cool news! Works fine.
Thanks for the prompt review! Will send V2 in a minute.
Wolfram
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
