On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 07:02:45PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Günter, > > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 05:21:44PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de> wrote: > >> >> My Salvator-X reboots after timeout from "cat > /dev/watchdog0", but > >> >> it doesn't reboot through "reboot" or "reboot -f"? > >> > > >> > That sadly doesn't work on Gen3. From the RFC v5 cover letter: > >> > >> > === > >> > > >> > * drop restart_handler since ARM64 uses PSCI firmware resets which do > >> > not call restart handlers > >> > > >> > The last point was quite a bummer to me because plain reboot was the > >> > reason I wrote this driver ;) Well, so is life... > >> > >> That's indeed silly. Can't we have it as a low-priority restart handler, to > > > > Yes, it is. It defeats the purpose of restart handlers. PSCI reset should > > have > > been implemented as a high priority restart handler. > > Unfortunately that won't work: psci_sys_reset() doesn't return on failure. > You mean it just hangs ? That is bad. If that is the case, it is not reliable and thus should be a low priority (or at best medium priority) restart handler (which can be replaced with a working higher priority one).
> We can still clear arm_pm_restart in platform code, though ;-) > I had originally planned to replace arm_pm_restart() completely with restart handlers. Maybe I should revive the effort ? Guenter
