On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 01:29:43PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:35:21PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > 
> > >           i2c9 = "i2cexio1";
> > >           i2c10 = "i2chdmi";
> > >           i2c11 = "gpioi2c";
> > > +         i2c12 = "i2cpwr";
> > 
> > To make it easier for users, we should maybe group them?
> > 
> > i2c8+9: additional gpio busses
> > i2c10-13: i2cexioX
> 
> Should we also group gpioi2cX?

That's what I meant with "additional gpio busses" :) I assume we only
need 2 on lager.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to