Hi Mark
Thank you for your feedback
> > This function tries to get card name from snd_soc_of_parse_card_name().
> > and it tries to set card->name from dai_link if card still doesn't have
> > name.
> > So, above is optional 2nd try.
> > Or, do you mean this if (!card->name) can goes to simple-card, instead of
> > utils ?
> > I have no objection about it , but it can be double handling ?
> > Because other simple family have same situation.
>
> If we try to dereference card->dai_link without checking to see if it's
> set then we'll crash.
Ahh, do you mean we need like this ?
if (!card->name && card->dai_link)
card->name = card->dai_link->name;
