Hi Simon,

> > We use the helper function which populates the smp_init pointer only in
> > case of SMP.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
> 
> could you describe the motivation for this change in the changelog?

I am not sure what that could be. For me, it is pretty obvious that we
should not call smp_init() in case of !SMP ?

Regards,

   Wolfram

Reply via email to