Hi Wolfram,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> wrote:
> here is a topic branch for renesas-drivers adding HS200 support to SDHI.
> It is based on the tag "renesas-drivers-2016-12-06-v4.9-rc8" because the
> feature is built on top of the SDR104 series by Simon which was merged
> upstream just recently in the merge window. Is this okay? Or do you
> prefer another branch based on v4.10-rc1 once it is available?
Please don't base pull requests on old renesas-drivers releases, if possible,
else I'll have to rebase your branch(es) myself.
> mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: simplify accessing DT data
> mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: improve prerequisite for hw_reset
> mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: improve prerequisites for tuning
> mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: remove superfluous check in hw_reset
> mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: remove superfluous check in init_tuning
> mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: remove superfluous check in SCC error check
> mmc: sh_mobile_sdhi: enable HS200
Please base this on Ulf's mmc/next, or on v4.10-rc1 once it becomes available.
> arm64: dts: r8a7795: enable HS200 for eMMC
> arm64: dts: r8a7796: enable HS200 for eMMC
Please base this on an appropriate reasonable stable tree, e.g.
renesas-devel-20161212-v4.9.
Thank you!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
