Hi Wolfram,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de> wrote:
>> I have tested with "the new mmc/next" and things seem better.
>
> Good. The issue you saw is expected when you have not the enablement
> patches in place.
>
>> I am still of a mind to drop the M3-W patch of this series because unless
>> we can control the order that things are merged into Linus's tree
>> there will be a temporary regression there. Moreover I'm not very excited
>> about renesas-next having regressed.
>
> I have not heard of a regression. Geert, did you report that? Did I miss
> that? As you can see, I did test the patches with M3 as well:
>
> http://elinux.org/Tests:eMMC-HS
>
> and Jinso test team (Duc-san) confirmed it works for them with H3 and
> M3-W. In private communication, though.
The issue happened with renesas-devel, i.e. without those patches.
It was mentioned during last core meeting, so have a look at that log.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
