Hi Simon,

On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Ulrich Hecht
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7796.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7796.dtsi 
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7796.dtsi
> index c5f0df5..782063a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7796.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7796.dtsi
> @@ -430,6 +430,9 @@
>                                  <&cpg CPG_CORE R8A7796_CLK_S3D1>,
>                                  <&scif_clk>;
>                         clock-names = "fck", "brg_int", "scif_clk";
> +                       dmas = <&dmac1 0x51>, <&dmac1 0x50>,
> +                              <&dmac2 0x51>, <&dmac2 0x50>;
> +                       dma-names = "tx", "rx", "tx", "rx";
>                         power-domains = <&sysc R8A7796_PD_ALWAYS_ON>;
>                         status = "disabled";

Apparently the DMA properties were added to the HSCIF nodes instead
of the SCIF nodes while applying this patch?

3 lines of context is not sufficient to distinguish between the various SCIF
and HSCIF nodes :-(

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Reply via email to