Hi Wolfram
> Resume failed because of uninitialized registers. Instead of adding a
> resume callback, we simply initialize registers before every transfer.
> This lightweight change is more robust and will keep us safe if we ever
> need support for power domains or dynamic frequency changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Morimoto-san: you convinced me that putting all register settings to one place
> is a nice thing to do. Here is the patch for that. However, having
> pm_runtime_get/put in one place won't work, I am afraid. For I2C slave or
> multi-master support, we need permanent-on handling. So, I think the current
> pm_runtime handling is good in that regard. Can you agree?
Thanks.
I understand about I2C slave / multi-master case of pm_runtime_get/put.
But in probe case (after rcar_i2c_init() move), we can't do like below ?
this is more clear code for me.
-------------
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
index 26f2ff2..db7f4d1 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
@@ -855,7 +855,6 @@ static int rcar_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
priv->dma_rx = priv->dma_tx = ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
- pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
ret = rcar_i2c_clock_calculate(priv, &i2c_t);
if (ret < 0)
goto out_pm_put;
@@ -863,11 +862,10 @@ static int rcar_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
rcar_i2c_init(priv);
/* Don't suspend when multi-master to keep arbitration working */
- if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "multi-master"))
+ if (of_property_read_bool(dev->of_node, "multi-master")) {
priv->flags |= ID_P_PM_BLOCKED;
- else
- pm_runtime_put(dev);
-
+ pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
+ }
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, rcar_i2c_irq, 0, dev_name(dev), priv);
