On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 10:14:45AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> > * Don't add bogus ',' after KERN_DEBUG
> 
> Well...
> 
> > @@ -127,16 +127,17 @@ static int tmio_mmc_next_sg(struct tmio_mmc_host 
> > *host)
> >  
> >  #define STATUS_TO_TEXT(a, status, i) \
> >     do { \
> > -           if (status & TMIO_STAT_##a) { \
> > -                   if (i++) \
> > -                           printk(" | "); \
> > -                   printk(#a); \
> > +           if ((status) & TMIO_STAT_##a) { \
> > +                   if ((i)++) \
> > +                           printk(KERN_DEBUG " | "); \
> > +                   printk(KERN_DEBUG, #a); \
> 
> ...still there.

Oops.

> > @@ -349,13 +350,22 @@ static int tmio_mmc_start_command(struct 
> > tmio_mmc_host *host, struct mmc_command
> >     }
> >  
> >     switch (mmc_resp_type(cmd)) {
> > -   case MMC_RSP_NONE: c |= RESP_NONE; break;
> > +   case MMC_RSP_NONE:
> > +           c |= RESP_NONE;
> > +           break;
> >     case MMC_RSP_R1:
> >     case MMC_RSP_R1_NO_CRC:
> > -                      c |= RESP_R1;   break;
> > -   case MMC_RSP_R1B:  c |= RESP_R1B;  break;
> > -   case MMC_RSP_R2:   c |= RESP_R2;   break;
> > -   case MMC_RSP_R3:   c |= RESP_R3;   break;
> > +           c |= RESP_R1;
> > +           break;
> > +   case MMC_RSP_R1B:
> > +           c |= RESP_R1B;
> > +           break;
> > +   case MMC_RSP_R2:
> > +           c |= RESP_R2;
> > +           break;
> > +   case MMC_RSP_R3:
> > +           c |= RESP_R3;
> > +           break;
> 
> Very personal, I'd prefer the old way but I don't insist.
> 
> > -                    * Disable auto CMD12 at IO_RW_EXTENDED and 
> > SET_BLOCK_COUNT
> > -                    * when doing multiple block transfer
> > +                    * Disable auto CMD12 at IO_RW_EXTENDED and
> > +                    * SET_BLOCK_COUNT when doing multiple block
> > +                    * transfer
> 
> I'd think 'transfer' can go to the previous line?
> 
> >                     if ((host->pdata->flags & TMIO_MMC_HAVE_CMD12_CTRL) &&
> > -                       (cmd->opcode == SD_IO_RW_EXTENDED || 
> > host->mrq->sbc))
> > +                       (cmd->opcode == SD_IO_RW_EXTENDED ||
> > +                        host->mrq->sbc))
> 
> Another subjective taste thingie ;)
> 
> > -           dev_warn_once(&host->pdev->dev,
> > -                 "Too many taps, skipping tuning. Please consider updating 
> > size of taps field of tmio_mmc_host\n");
> > +           dev_warn_once(&host->pdev->dev, "Too many taps, skipping 
> > tuning. Please consider updating size of taps field of tmio_mmc_host\n");
> 
> Dito.
> 
> What kind of tests did you run with these?

I checked that Lager boots and that I/O speeds are as expected using dd.

Reply via email to