On 10/10/2017 04:58 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Add a device node for the ROHM BD9571MWV PMIC, based on the example in
> the DT binding documentation, but using INTC-EX instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
> ---
> Do we need to describe more regulators?
To my knowledge, no.
> This depends on:
> - [PATCH] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7796: Add support for INTC-EX IRQ pins,
> - [PATCH] pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7795: Add INTC-EX pins, groups and
> function.
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/salvator-common.dtsi | 29
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/salvator-common.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/salvator-common.dtsi
> index 3dcb26b1cb6bdec0..c171718bac7f52a1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/salvator-common.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/salvator-common.dtsi
> @@ -353,6 +353,30 @@
>
> &i2c_dvfs {
> status = "okay";
> +
> + pmic: pmic@30 {
> + pinctrl-0 = <&irq0_pins>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> +
> + compatible = "rohm,bd9571mwv";
> + reg = <0x30>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&intc_ex>;
Shouldn't this be gpio2 ? Why intc-ex ?
> + interrupts = <0 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> + gpio-controller;
> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> +
> + regulators {
> + dvfs: dvfs {
> + regulator-name = "dvfs";
> + regulator-min-microvolt = <750000>;
> + regulator-max-microvolt = <1030000>;
> + regulator-boot-on;
> + regulator-always-on;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> };
>
> &ohci0 {
> @@ -407,6 +431,11 @@
> function = "i2c2";
> };
>
> + irq0_pins: irq0 {
> + groups = "intc_ex_irq0";
> + function = "intc_ex";
> + };
> +
> pwm1_pins: pwm1 {
> groups = "pwm1_a";
> function = "pwm1";
>
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
