On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 03:20:29PM +0000, Chris Brandt wrote:
> On Friday, September 29, 2017, Chris Brandt wrote:
> > Most systems with this i2c are going to have a clock of either 33.3MHz or
> > 32MHz. That 4% difference is not reason enough to warrant that the driver
> > to completely fail.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Brandt <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > v2:
> >  * simplified error message.
> > ---
> 
> What ever happened to this patch?
> Was there any objection?

In deed, I'd prefer to limit the settings to the two known frequencies.
We shouldn't use the settings if someone is using it with e.g. 16MHz?

Of course, my most favorite option would be implementing the formula
instead of fixed settings, but I am not forcing that on you.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to