Hi Simon,

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:08:45AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Add a defconfig for Renesas R-Car Gen3 boards.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Against renesas-devel-20171013-v4.14-rc4.
>> Not intended for upstream merge.
>>
>> Loosely based on arm64 defconfig, with support for non-Renesas SoCs and
>> boards removed, and missing support added.
>>
>> Simon, if you include this in your tree, I can add to renesas-drivers
>> extra configuration for drivers that are in renesas-drivers, but not yet
>> upstream.
>>
>> People submitting topic branches for inclusion in renesas-drivers are
>> encouraged to update renesas_defconfig where appropriate.
>
> Thanks,
>
> I have created a topic/renesas-defconfig branch to hold this
> not-for-upstream config. I will include that in the devel branch
> of the renesas tree for now on.
>
> I do not plan to include it in the next branch at this time, as that branch
> is included in linux-next and is for code targeted at upstream.
>
> If you would like to refine the above then lets discuss.

Thank you, that matches what I had in mind.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Reply via email to