On Wednesday 18 October 2017 05:10 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> 
> 
> On Monday 09 October 2017 03:52 PM, Biju Das wrote:
>> Add USB PHY support for r8a7743/5 SoC. Renesas RZ/G1[ME] (R8A7743/5)
>> USB PHY is identical to the R-Car Gen2 family.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <[email protected]>
>> Acked-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
> 
> merged, thanks!

just realized $subject is misleading since this is only dt-binding patch. Do
you plan to send the driver patch too?

Thanks
Kishon
> 
> -Kishon
>> ---
>> This patch is tested against Linux next tag next-20170929.
>>
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt | 7 +++++--
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt 
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt
>> index 91da947..eeb9e18 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt
>> @@ -4,10 +4,13 @@ This file provides information on what the device node for 
>> the R-Car generation
>>  2 USB PHY contains.
>>  
>>  Required properties:
>> -- compatible: "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7790" if the device is a part of R8A7790 
>> SoC.
>> +- compatible: "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7743" if the device is a part of R8A7743 
>> SoC.
>> +          "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7745" if the device is a part of R8A7745 SoC.
>> +          "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7790" if the device is a part of R8A7790 SoC.
>>            "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7791" if the device is a part of R8A7791 SoC.
>>            "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7794" if the device is a part of R8A7794 SoC.
>> -          "renesas,rcar-gen2-usb-phy" for a generic R-Car Gen2 compatible 
>> device.
>> +          "renesas,rcar-gen2-usb-phy" for a generic R-Car Gen2 or
>> +                                      RZ/G1 compatible device.
>>  
>>            When compatible with the generic version, nodes must list the
>>            SoC-specific version corresponding to the platform first
>>

Reply via email to