Hi Wolfram,
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Wolfram Sang
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt recommends to use usleep_range for
> delays 1-20ms. Let's adhere to it. No need for messing with HZ and still
> do busy looping these days.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Here is a more detailed test page for this describing my tests:
>
> https://elinux.org/Tests:mmc-delay-refactor
>
> I did mainly test the insert/eject cycle because powering up the cards
> seemed to trigger most delays. Transferring data did not cause any calls
> to mmc_delay() for me. Please let me know if someone knows a test pattern
> which should be included before applying this change.
JFTR, with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y, I assume ?
(also for the other patch)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
