Hi, Sorry, I got a mistake in my previous mail. MMC can be used normally in kernel 4.14 on porter, so just ignore the issue:1 in my pre-mail. Thanks.
The test results report in the pre-mail is correct. Now, I have two questions, 1. Benchmark.netpipe failed, error msg as below: ... Send and receive buffers are 16384 and 87380 bytes (A bug in Linux doubles the requested buffer sizes) Using a perturbation value of 2 ... I didn't know much about it, so could someone tell me if it's a real bug? 2. About the BSP drivers tests[1], those tests can be used on porter? Thanks. [1] https://github.com/Jinzai-solution/SALVATOR_SHELL Best regards Liu > -----Original Message----- > From: fuego-boun...@lists.linuxfoundation.org > [mailto:fuego-boun...@lists.linuxfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Liu, > Wenlong > Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 3:50 PM > To: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: fu...@lists.linuxfoundation.org > Subject: [Fuego] Kernel 4.14 test results on porter > > Hi, friends > > Porter board has been used for evaluations and product development, and > so did we. > I have done some tests and validation on the porter with the 4.14 kernel > recently. > Glad to expand this test results to Renesas Kernel Team. > I also CCed the Fuego Team, because the latest Fuego was used to do such > a overall test and I also want to share the test results to them. > > The following tests have been done: > 1. Functional.LTP: syscalls fs fsx dio io mm ipc math nptl pty admin_tools > timers commands sched crashme 2. Most Functional&Benchmark tests in Fuego > 3. BSP drivers tests > > According to test log, it seems that there no big issue, but: > 1. In order to boot successfully, I have to use the nfs or sdx as the > rootfs(it > seems that the mmc can't be used). > 2. Benchmark.netpipe failed, error msg as below: > ... > Send and receive buffers are 16384 and 87380 bytes > (A bug in Linux doubles the requested buffer sizes) > Using a perturbation value of 2 > ... > > For the drivers test, I have checked this repository[1]. > The BSP driver tests have been done on porter, but there are many failed > cases than I thought. > It seems that those configurations and tests are not very clear to me yet. > So, who can tell me how to do those tests properly on porter? > (@Fuego, maybe those BSP driver tests could also be added into Fuego in > the future) > > -- > The test result format of the attachment is same with the shared report > of Khiem-san before. Thanks. > > Thanks. > > [1] https://github.com/Jinzai-solution/SALVATOR_SHELL > > Best regards > Liu > >
