Hi Sergei,
On Monday, 15 January 2018 22:25:16 EET Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 01/13/2018 02:14 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > The LVDS encoders used to be described in DT as part of the DU. They now
> > have their own DT node, linked to the DU using the OF graph bindings.
> > This allows moving internal LVDS encoder support to a separate driver
> > modelled as a DRM bridge. Backward compatibility is retained as legacy
> > DT is patched live to move to the new bindings.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+rene...@ideasonboard.com>
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c index 6e02c762a557..06a3fbdd728a
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
>
> [...]
>
> > /* --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > @@ -74,7 +75,6 @@ static const struct rcar_du_device_info
> > rzg1_du_r8a7745_info = {
> > .port = 1,
> },
> > },
> > - .num_lvds = 0,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct rcar_du_device_info rcar_du_r8a7779_info = {
> > @@ -95,14 +95,13 @@ static const struct rcar_du_device_info
> > rcar_du_r8a7779_info = {
> > .port = 1,
> > },
> > },
> > - .num_lvds = 0,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct rcar_du_device_info rcar_du_r8a7790_info = {
> > .gen = 2,
> > .features = RCAR_DU_FEATURE_CRTC_IRQ_CLOCK
> > | RCAR_DU_FEATURE_EXT_CTRL_REGS,
> > - .quirks = RCAR_DU_QUIRK_ALIGN_128B | RCAR_DU_QUIRK_LVDS_LANES,
> > + .quirks = RCAR_DU_QUIRK_ALIGN_128B,
> > .num_crtcs = 3,
> > .routes = {
> > /*
> > @@ -164,7 +163,6 @@ static const struct rcar_du_device_info
> > rcar_du_r8a7792_info = {
> > .port = 1,
> > },
> > },
> > - .num_lvds = 0,
> > };
> >
> > static const struct rcar_du_device_info rcar_du_r8a7794_info = {
> > @@ -186,7 +184,6 @@ static const struct rcar_du_device_info
> > rcar_du_r8a7794_info = {
> > .port = 1,
> > },
> > },
> > - .num_lvds = 0,
>
> I think you can remove *all* such initializers and the field itself with
> them -- otherwise it looks like you're doing a not-quite-related drive-by
> clean up...
The OF compatibility code uses the .num_lvds field, that's why I haven't
removed it.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
