On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:26 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 March 2018 14:30:39 EEST Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:01:32AM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
>> > + switch (priv->lanes) {
>> > + case 1:
>> > + phycnt = PHYCNT_ENABLECLK | PHYCNT_ENABLE_0;
>> > + break;
>> > + case 2:
>> > + phycnt = PHYCNT_ENABLECLK | PHYCNT_ENABLE_1 | PHYCNT_ENABLE_0;
>> > + break;
>> > + case 4:
>> > + phycnt = PHYCNT_ENABLECLK | PHYCNT_ENABLE_3 | PHYCNT_ENABLE_2 |
>> > + PHYCNT_ENABLE_1 | PHYCNT_ENABLE_0;
>> > + break;
>> > + default:
>> > + return -EINVAL;
>> > + }
>>
>> I guess you could have a simpler construct here using this:
>>
>> phycnt = PHYCNT_ENABLECLK;
>>
>> switch (priv->lanes) {
>> case 4:
>> phycnt |= PHYCNT_ENABLE_3 | PHYCNT_ENABLE_2;
>> case 2:
>> phycnt |= PHYCNT_ENABLE_1;
>> case 1:
>> phycnt |= PHYCNT_ENABLE_0;
>> break;
>>
>> default:
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> But that's really up to you.
>
> Wouldn't Niklas' version generate simpler code as it uses direct assignments ?
Alternatively, you could check for a valid number of lanes, and use knowledge
about the internal lane bits:
phycnt = PHYCNT_ENABLECLK;
phycnt |= (1 << priv->lanes) - 1;
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
