Eugeniu, > So, the idea is that the startup improvement of rcar_i2c_driver_init() > comes at the cost of a slower cs2000_driver_init(). In the end, > there is no benefit
Thank you for the measurements and heads up on this! Much appreciated. The results match my expectations. > If evidence in the form of measurements showing improved behavior > is not enough for the patch to be accepted, then we have no choice but > to keep the patch out-of-tree as a "workaround", hoping that we'll be able > to come up with a better/cleaner solution in future. I am all with you. It is not that I don't want faster boot times. Yet, unless we know if this is a proper solution and not a workaround for just some use cases, I am reluctant to apply it to the upstream kernel. Thanks and kind regards, Wolfram
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
