On 04/08/2018 06:51 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 04/08/2018 09:34 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 04/08/2018 05:27 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: >>> On 04/08/2018 06:09 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>> This patch replaces the (1 << n) with BIT(n) and cleans up whitespace, >>>> no functional change. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Phil Edworthy <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Simon Horman <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>> --- >>>> V2: Reword the commit message >>>> --- >>>> drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 52 >>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- >>>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c >>>> index 25f68305322c..5ab7bf6a8de0 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c >>>> @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ >>> >>> missing this: >>> >>> #include <linux/bitops.h> >> >> This compiles just fine without it though, which means it's probably >> pulled in through some of the other includes already present. >> > > I suspected that. However, please see rule #1 in > Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst: > > 1) If you use a facility then #include the file that defines/declares > that facility. Don't depend on other header files pulling in ones > that you use.
If I was to include every single header from which I use something, wouldn't that make the list real long then ? Is that really worth it? -- Best regards, Marek Vasut
