On 04/10/2018 03:13 PM, jacopo mondi wrote:

>>> From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+rene...@ragnatech.se>
>>> Add the LVDS device to r8a77970.dtsi in a disabled state. Also connect
>>> the it to the LVDS output of the DU.
>>> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+rene...@ragnatech.se>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+rene...@jmondi.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>
>>> ---
>>> v1 -> v2:
>>> - Rebased on the modified endpoint name and changed patch subject to
>>>   comply with other patches in the series from Sergei.
>>    Stop, what was wrong with my R8A77970 LVDS patch, reposted on the popular
>> demand? :-)
> Nothing wrong, I found out about your right now.
> I see a very small difference as
>          lvds@feb90000 vs lvds-encoder@feb90000

   Yes, I thought the latter was closer to a "generic" name that DT spec 

> You can add your signed-off-by ofc if you think that's the case.

   Didn't understand what you mean here...

> Thanks
>    j

MBR, Sergei

Reply via email to