From: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> Give a clear testcase for people wishing to change this code. It is also a reminder for me if people ask about it.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c index c6915b835396..9d8d5b91220f 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c @@ -542,6 +542,8 @@ static void rcar_i2c_irq_recv(struct rcar_i2c_priv *priv, u32 msr) * If next received data is the _LAST_, go to STOP phase. Might be * overwritten by REP START when setting up a new msg. Not elegant * but the only stable sequence for REP START I have found so far. + * If you want to change this code, make sure sending one transfer with + * four messages (WR-RD-WR-RD) works! */ if (priv->pos + 1 >= msg->len) rcar_i2c_write(priv, ICMCR, RCAR_BUS_PHASE_STOP); -- 2.11.0
