On 05/23/2018 11:56 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 07:05:06PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 05/23/2018 06:17 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: >>> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 03:11:20PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>> The function name is just too confusing, rename it, no functional change. >>>> Rename the function to rcar_pcie_alloc_and_parse_pci_resource_list() as >>>> it's matching failpath function is pci_free_resource_list() so the names >>>> align much better and the new name also describes what the function does >>>> much better. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Phil Edworthy <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Simon Horman <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]> >>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>> --- >>>> drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c | 4 ++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> Can you rebase this series against my pci/rcar branch please ? >>> >>> I will merge it then, thanks. >> >> Where is that tree/branch located ? >> >> It applies fine on current next 20180517, is there a problem ? > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lpieralisi/pci.git/log/?h=pci/rcar
OK, 1/4 is dropped, the remaining patches are resubmitted. I added one more (6/6) since the phy patches in that tree added a bug into the fail path, so I fixed that too. > I don't think next 20180517 includes Lorenzo's pci/rcar branch, so > there might be conflicts. I think Stephen is on vacation until next > week, so there isn't a newer -next tree yet. OK -- Best regards, Marek Vasut
