On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 01:35:08PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hello Eugeniu,
> Thank you for the patch.
> On Sunday, 5 August 2018 02:11:01 EEST Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> > Perform a 's/(h|m)3ulcb/ulcb/' substitution in below DTS filenames:
> > - r8a7795-es1-h3ulcb.dts => r8a7795-es1-ulcb.dts
> > - r8a7795-es1-h3ulcb-kf.dts => r8a7795-es1-ulcb-kf.dts
> > - r8a7795-h3ulcb.dts => r8a7795-ulcb.dts
> > - r8a7795-h3ulcb-kf.dts => r8a7795-ulcb-kf.dts
> > - r8a7796-m3ulcb.dts => r8a7796-ulcb.dts
> > - r8a7796-m3ulcb-kf.dts => r8a7796-ulcb-kf.dts
> > The background of this commit is M3-N ULCB (RTP0RC77965SKBX010SA00)
> > bring-up, which (assuming no change in existing DTS name patterns)
> > requires two new DTS files:
> > - r8a77965-m3nulcb.dts
> > - r8a77965-m3nulcb-kf.dts
> > In all above examples:
> > - "m3n" prefix is redundant, since r8a77965 denotes the M3-N SoC
> > - "m3" prefix is redundant, since r8a7796 denotes the M3/M3-W SoC
> > - "h3" prefix is redundant, since r8a7795 denotes the H3 SoC
> The naming convention is roughly <soc>-<board>.dts. For instance, in r8a7795-
> h3ulcb.dts, the SoC is R8A7795 and the board "H3 ULCB". With the proposed
> rename we would break that convention.
> However, the name ULCB itself (which stands for Ultra Low Cost Board) might
> already not follow the naming convention, as the boards are officially called
> R-Car Starter Kit (Pro and Premier). The V3M and V3H "low-cost" boards
> that properly, with their .dts files named r8a77970-v3msk.dts and r8a77970-
> v3hsk.dts respectively.
> I'm not opposed to simplifying the file names, but I think we should then
> decide on a simpler convention. In particular the H3/M3 and V3 .dts files
> should in my opinion follow the same convention.
> I'll now let others comment on this as I don't have such a strong opinion on
> this topic.
At this point I'd prefer to keep the current, albeit imperfect scheme,
and avoid churn.