On Wednesday, August 29, 2018 1, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > My concern is if we can avoid changing the TIMER_OF_DECLARE because of > the boot order, it would be better. > > Can returning EPROBE_DEFER fix this issue? Or use the 'complex > dependencies' [1]?
I'll try returning EPROBE_DEFER and see if that is an easy fix. Chris
