> > Is the intent of the proposed changes to prevent the unload of
> > a module if it was loaded with the "nowayout" parameter?
> >
> > If so, I thought the WD "nowayout" semantic was only supposed to be in 
> > effect
> > after /dev/watchdog was opened.  The proposed change looks like it makes the
> > "nowayout" semantic take effect before /dev/watchdog is opened.
> 
> Thanks, that's IMHO a very valid point.

I agree, thanks for this input.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to