On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 03:08:26PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 02:02:12PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > > > Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC DT updates for v4.21. > > > > I am sending out this pull-request at this time as there are a number > > of patches queued up in my arm (32) DT branch and I hope that this > > will ease the burden later on in the development cycle. I expect to > > send a follow-up pull-request for this branch at the usual pre-rc6 timing. > > > > Changes since v1: > > * Correct garbled Reviewed-by tag in > > "[PATCH 01/16] ARM: dts: r9a06g032: Add pinctrl node" > > > > The following changes since commit 651022382c7f8da46cb4872a545ee1da6d097d2a: > > > > Linux 4.20-rc1 (2018-11-04 15:37:52 -0800) > > > > are available in the git repository at: > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/horms/renesas.git > > tags/renesas-arm-dt-for-v4.21 > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 673df60a880f060e3e94920c7b5f7a9ed8aa65f2: > > ARM: dts: r9a06g032: Correct the GIC DT node name (2018-11-28 13:55:30 > > +0100) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Renesas ARM Based SoC DT Updates for v4.21 > > > > * RZ/N1D (r9a06g032) SoC: > > - Correct GIC DT node name > > - Enable pin controller > > > > * RZ/G1C (r8a77470) iWave g23S single board computer > > - Add QSPI flash support > > - Add pinctl support for EtherAVB > > - Enable CMT0 (Renesas R-Car Compare Match Timer) > > - Enable RWDT (Renesas Watchdog Timer) > > - Enable uSD and eMMC support > > > > * RZ/G1C (r8a77470) SoC: > > - Describe USB-DMAC and I2C devices in DT > > > > * R-Mobile A1 (r8a7740), Emma Mobile EV2 (emev2) and > > SH-Mobile AG5 (sh72a0) SoCs: > > - Include SoC name in DTSI > > > > * R-Car H2 (r8a7790) based lager, and > > R-Car M2-W (r8a7791) based koelsch and porter boards: > > - Disable unconnected LVDS encoders > > Hi, > > If you revise a previous pull request, please do it as a new tag (and > delete the old one so our pull will fail), or at least please reply to > it so I see a "please don't pull this, I've respun a v2" threaded reply. > > No harm done in this case, since you rewrote with the previous tag, > but it made me scratch my head when I saw the previous one and the hash > didn't match the email. ;)
Thanks Olof, next time I'll create a new tag.
