We should get 'driver_data' from 'struct device' directly. Going via
platform_device is an unneeded step back and forth.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
---

Build tested only. buildbot is happy.

 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c 
b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
index 5a850491a5cb..4ee135d7b883 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91-pio4.c
@@ -868,8 +868,7 @@ static struct pinctrl_desc atmel_pinctrl_desc = {
 
 static int __maybe_unused atmel_pctrl_suspend(struct device *dev)
 {
-       struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
-       struct atmel_pioctrl *atmel_pioctrl = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+       struct atmel_pioctrl *atmel_pioctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
        int i, j;
 
        /*
@@ -897,8 +896,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused atmel_pctrl_suspend(struct device 
*dev)
 
 static int __maybe_unused atmel_pctrl_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
-       struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
-       struct atmel_pioctrl *atmel_pioctrl = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+       struct atmel_pioctrl *atmel_pioctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
        int i, j;
 
        for (i = 0; i < atmel_pioctrl->nbanks; i++) {
-- 
2.19.0

Reply via email to