Hi Marek,
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 8:07 PM Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/15/2018 07:54 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 7:49 PM Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On 12/15/2018 07:47 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 7:38 PM Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> On 12/15/2018 06:23 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 02:49:22AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> >>>>>> Introduce new thermal_zone_of_sensor_register_params() function, which
> >>>>>> allows passing struct thermal_zone_params into it and convert original
> >>>>>> thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() to call it with params set to NULL.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <[email protected]>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Git complains about mismatch between From: and this SOB.
> >>>>
> >>>> I recall a discussion about gmail stripping the +foo tags from email
> >>>> addresses. I can add a From: tag into the patch to override this
> >>>> braindeath, or is there a better solution ?
> >>>
> >>> Run the "git format-patch" command from a git repo where user.email
> >>> is [email protected], so it will retain the original From: tag in the
> >>> email body, as it is different?
> >>
> >> I can also manually patch the From tags or add them, but it's all
> >> workarounds.
> >
> > Use a different outgoing email server? I use my ISP's.
>
> Or maybe it'd make sense to fix git to handle the +tags correctly ?
What needs to be fixed?
If user.email != From, git format-patch generates a From: header, else
it doesn't. Doesn't that make sense?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
