On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 10:01:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 9:57 AM Simon Horman <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2019 at 11:45:37AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 10:53 AM Simon Horman <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > Enable the R-Car thermal driver as a built-in. > > > > > > > > This driver is used in conjunction with the R-Car V3M (r8a77970), > > > > E3 (r8a77990) and D3 (r8a77995) SoCs. > > > > > > > [v2] Enable as a built-in rather than a module as this seems > > > > safer from the point of view of protecting equipment from > > > > overheating. > > > > > > Shouldn't the above paragraph be moved below the ---? > > > > I have recently come to believe that its a matter of taste. And I think in > > this case it captures important information that is worthy of inclusion in > > the changelog. > > The rationale behind doing it this way could still be appended to the > first line of the body of the patch decription.
Sorry, I'm having a little trouble parsing that. Do you mean that it could be appended to the body of the changelog at apply-time?
