Hello,
On Monday, 7 January 2019 12:38:39 EET Kieran Bingham wrote:
> On 07/01/2019 10:05, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > Hi Kieran,
>
> <snip>
>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x.h
> >>> b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x.h index b482c7fe6957..bc2da1b5ce29
> >>> 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x.h
> >>> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/adv748x/adv748x.h
> >>> @@ -89,8 +89,12 @@ struct adv748x_csi2 {
> >>>
> >>> #define notifier_to_csi2(n) container_of(n, struct adv748x_csi2,
> >>> notifier)
> >>> #define adv748x_sd_to_csi2(sd) container_of(sd, struct adv748x_csi2,
> >>> sd)
> >>>
> >>> +
> >>>
> >>> #define is_tx_enabled(_tx) ((_tx)->state->endpoints[(_tx)->port] !=
> >>> NULL)
> >>>
> >>> -#define is_txa(_tx) ((_tx) == &(_tx)->state->txa)
> >>> +#define __is_tx(_tx, _ab) ((_tx) == &(_tx)->state->tx##_ab)
> >>> +#define is_txa(_tx) __is_tx(_tx, a)
> >>> +#define is_txb(_tx) __is_tx(_tx, b)
> >>
> >> I would have just duplicated the is_txa() line here... but this is good
> >> too :)
> >
> > I agree it might seem more complex than necessary. I initially made it
> > like this as I started from the 'is_tx()' macro this series adds in
> > 6/6.
> >
> > If it is easier to have an '((_tx) == &(_tx)->state->txb)' I can
> > change this.
I would find it cleaner to write out is_txa and is_txb explicitly instead of
hiding the implementation behind an __is_tx macro, especially given that we
won't have to extend this in the future.
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <[email protected]>
> It's fine for me as you've got it.
>
> It's still clear and readable, and implements the required functionality.
>
> <snip>
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
