Hi Marek,

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 1:06 AM Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/11/19 10:41 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 1:56 AM <marek.va...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rcar.c
> >> @@ -152,14 +152,12 @@ struct rcar_pcie {
> >>         struct                  rcar_msi msi;
> >>  };
> >>
> >> -static void rcar_pci_write_reg(struct rcar_pcie *pcie, unsigned long val,
> >> -                              unsigned long reg)
> >> +static void rcar_pci_write_reg(struct rcar_pcie *pcie, u32 val, u32 reg)
> >
> > Doesn't unsigned int make more sense for reg?
>
> Isn't u32 more explicit ?

It's just an offset in the register block, with a range much smaller than u32.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Reply via email to