Hi Geert,

Thanks for your work.

On 2019-03-20 11:44:46 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>   - The IPSR field is meant for documentation only,
>   - The function name refers to the pin function, not to the IPSR field.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <[email protected]>

> ---
> To be queued in sh-pfc-for-v5.2.
> 
>  drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> index 2a6abeb62bab659b..7db5819eea7e6e0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> @@ -418,8 +418,8 @@ extern const struct sh_pfc_soc_info shx3_pinmux_info;
>  /*
>   * Describe a pinmux configuration in which a pin is physically multiplexed
>   * with other pins.
> - *   - ipsr: IPSR field
> - *   - fn: Function name, also referring to the IPSR field
> + *   - ipsr: IPSR field (unused, for documentation purposes only)
> + *   - fn: Function name
>   *   - psel: Physical multiplexing selector
>   */
>  #define PINMUX_IPSR_PHYS(ipsr, fn, psel) \
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

-- 
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund

Reply via email to