Hi Biju-san,

> From: Biju Das, Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 7:08 PM
> 
> Hi Shimoda-San,
> 
> Thanks for the feedback.
> 
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH V4 02/13] phy: renesas: phy-rcar-gen2: Add support for
> > r8a77470
> >
> > Hi Biju-san,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch!
> >
> > > From: Biju Das, Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 5:08 PM
> > <snip>
> > >  static int rcar_gen2_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)  {
> > >   struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > @@ -238,6 +313,8 @@ static int rcar_gen2_phy_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > >   struct resource *res;
> > >   void __iomem *base;
> > >   struct clk *clk;
> > > + const struct phy_ops *gen2_phy_ops = &rcar_gen2_phy_ops;
> > > + const u32 (*select_value)[PHYS_PER_CHANNEL]  = pci_select_value;
> > >   int i = 0;
> > >
> > >   if (!dev->of_node) {
> > > @@ -266,6 +343,11 @@ static int rcar_gen2_phy_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > >   drv->clk = clk;
> > >   drv->base = base;
> > >
> > > + if (soc_device_match(soc_r8a77470)) {
> >
> > I'm not sure, but this driver also should not use the soc_device_match() 
> > like
> > phy-rcar-gen3-usb2 driver?
> > If we add a special data struct and has phy_ops and select_value members,
> > we can achieve not to use the soc_device_match().
> 
> There is a difference compared to phy-rcar-gen3-usb2 driver.
> Here we are using generic compatible string for RZ/G1C.
> 
> With the  new proposal, I need to make  following changes.
> 
> 1)  Add r8a77470 compatible in phy_match table, fill the driver_data 
> structure and remove soc_device_match

I think so.

> 2)  Modify the SoC dtsi to remove generic compatible string.

I don't think so. For example, r8a77990.dtsi has compatible with both 
"renesas,usbhs-r8a77990" and "renesas,rcar-gen3-usbhs",
and then the renesas_usbhs driver has .data for renesas,usbhs-r8a77990, but it 
is not compatible
with .data of "renesas,rcar-gen3-usbhs".

Simon-san, what do you think?

Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda

> I will send V5 based on  new proposal, if you are ok for removing generic 
> compatibility.
> Please let me know.
> 
> Regards,
> Biju
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to