Hi Wolfram,

On 16/05/2019 22:13, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Even though we don't use it yet, we should mark the second I2C address
> this device is listening to as used.
> 
> Not yet for upstream until all dependencies are merged!
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+rene...@sang-engineering.com>

As I reviewed the other two anyway, it seems silly not to add this here :D

Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+rene...@ideasonboard.com>


> ---
>  drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c b/drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c
> index 455de74c0dd2..2133b09f6e7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9063-i2c.c
> @@ -221,6 +221,8 @@ static int da9063_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>               return ret;
>       }
>  
> +     devm_i2c_new_dummy_device(&i2c->dev, i2c->adapter, i2c->addr + 1);
> +
>       return da9063_device_init(da9063, i2c->irq);
>  }
>  
> 

Reply via email to