Dear Morimoto-san,

Thank for your feedback!

On 2019/05/23 13:07, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
Hi

+static int tpu_pwm_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+       struct tpu_device *tpu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+       struct pwm_chip *chip = &tpu->chip;
+       struct pwm_device *pwm;
+       int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i <= 3; i++) {
+               if ((pwm_get_chip_data(&chip->pwms[i])) != NULL) {
+                       pwm = &chip->pwms[i];
+                       if (!test_bit(PWMF_REQUESTED, &pwm->flags))
+                               return 0;
+               }
+       }
why 3 ?
According to Hardware manual, 16-Bit Timer Pulse Unit (TPU)
supports four 16-bit timers for both R-car GEN2 and GEN3.
Hmm...
You need to use chip->npwm or TPU_CHANNEL_MAX then ?

Thank for your opinion!
I will resubmit v3 to change 3 to TPU_CHANNEL_MAX.

+       pm_runtime_put(dev);
+
+       return 0;
+}
Do we need to call pm_runtime_xxx here ?
"pm_runtime_put(dev);" function is called for runtime idle operations.
I know.
I'm asking do we need to call it here ?

I think we should have it here better.

Thank you,
Dong

Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto

Reply via email to