Hello! On 04/09/2019 01:45 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
>>>> @@ -1979,8 +1985,9 @@ static void ravb_set_delay_mode(struct net_device >>>> *ndev) >>>> priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID) >>>> set |= APSR_DM_RDM; >>>> >>>> - if (priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID || >>>> - priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID) >>>> + if ((priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID || >>>> + priv->phy_interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID) && >>>> + !soc_device_match(ravb_delay_mode_quirk_match)) >>> >>> But don't we need to error out of the probing as we can't set the delay >>> mode >>> requested? >> >> Yes, if we can, we should error out. It just depends on if there are >> broken DT blobs out there. We recently had a lot of pain from broken >> DT blobs using the at803x PHY and getting RGMII modes wrong. In the >> long run, it is best to if DT, but i've no idea how many boards are >> affected. > > Hi Andrew, > > I suspect there are such blobs out there and I'm not sure > what the fall-out may or may not be. You mean the out-of-tree blobs? Because I'm not seeing any in-kernel breakage... MBR, Sergei
