> I guess the question is if it is allowed to have .master_xfer_atomic
> but not .master_xfer (and similarly for .smbus_xfer{,_atomic})? Maybe
> that decision should be made explicit? And perhaps enforced?xfer_atomic callbacks are optional. One xfer callback is mandatory. I did a check for falling back to master_xfer_atomic if there is no suitable smbus_xfer_atomic. I will think about the vice-versa case you mentioned. Yet, this is indeed a super corner case, so I prefer to fix this incrementally. > I don't care deeply about the above though, so feel free to do > something about it, or > > Reviewed-by: Peter Rosin <p...@axentia.se> Thanks for the review!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
