Hi all,

I tried to reproduce the results shown on

http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Cyclictest

So I ran

        cyclictest -t 1 -p 80 -i 10000 -n -l 10000              and
        cyclictest -t 1 -p 80 -i 10000 -l 10000

on my emdedded x86 Celeron, 600MHz using 2.6.17-rt3 and 2.6.19-rt15. Funny
enough the older version seems to be better:


2.6.17-rt3        4     33      10
2.6.19-rt15       9     31      19

2.6.17-rt3        4     35      19
2.6.19-rt15      16     38      29

2.6.17-rt3       11     34      22
2.6.19-rt15      27     55      42

2.6.17-rt3       24     47      33
2.6.19-rt15      41     100     56

Is there a known explanation?

Think I try to test some 2.6.20-rt tomorrow ...

-- 
Steven
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to