On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 01:59:05PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> We were trying to avoid libraries in a futile effort to keep the make
> process simple.... ah well.  This doesn't complicate things at all
> really it turns out, so I'm fine with it.

That's why I made it static libs - that's simple and works without
libtool.

> > Note: the libs should really be renamed, because calling a local library
> > "librt" is a very, very bad idea.
> 
> Agreed.  We were thinking of changing it to librttest - any other suggestions?

Sounds good. You should also think about taking it out of include/ and
put it into something like lib/ or libs/.

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
     Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-206917-9

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to