* Joe Korty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Add missing IRQs to /proc/interrupts.
>
> /proc/interrupts is not truly useful unless it displays every IRQ
> vector, not just those somebody thought would be interesting. For
> example, since the default /proc/interrupts setup did not display the
> rescheduling interrupt, the occurance of rescheduling interrupt floods
> ends up affecting latencies, yet without an entry in /proc/interrupts,
> it is difficult to discern why latencies are being affected.
>
> Also does a silly little expansion of the 'ERR:' display to be per
> cpu. This makes its layout identical to all the other display lines
> in /proc/interrupts.
we cannot really change the format of /proc/interrupts, tools might rely
on it - i undid previous -rt changes to the format. An acceptable
approach would be to introduce a new /proc/irq_debug file and put all
this (and other) information into it.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
