On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:40:04AM +0900, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> This patch adds a additional check in s3c_set_clksrc function to ensure
> that the clksrc_clk does have a choice of multiple clock sources. In addition
> to this, a check is added to ensure that a parent is assigned to the 
> clksrc_clk 
> in case it does not have a choice of parent clocks.

'This patch' is redudnant in this case, so how about Add an additional check...

I assume as we're not getting a pile of s3c6410 reports that this isn't
an urgent fix and that we can add this to the next-samsung series.
 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock-clksrc.c |   13 +++++++++----
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock-clksrc.c 
> b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock-clksrc.c
> index 33c633a..835921d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock-clksrc.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/clock-clksrc.c
> @@ -129,11 +129,16 @@ void __init_or_cpufreq s3c_set_clksrc(struct clksrc_clk 
> *clk, bool announce)
>  {
>       struct clksrc_sources *srcs = clk->sources;
>       u32 mask = bit_mask(clk->reg_src.shift, clk->reg_src.size);
> -     u32 clksrc = 0;
> -
> -     if (clk->reg_src.reg)
> -             clksrc = __raw_readl(clk->reg_src.reg);
> +     u32 clksrc;
>  
> +     if (!clk->reg_src.reg) {
> +             if (!clk->clk.parent)
> +                    printk(KERN_ERR "%s: no parent clock specified\n",
> +                             clk->clk.name);
> +             return;         
> +     }
> +     
> +     clksrc = __raw_readl(clk->reg_src.reg);
>       clksrc &= mask;
>       clksrc >>= clk->reg_src.shift;
>  
> -- 
> 1.6.3.3
> 

 
-- 
Ben

Q:      What's a light-year?
A:      One-third less calories than a regular year.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to