Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> On 06/14/2010 03:07 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > From: Abhilash Kesavan<[email protected]>
> >
> > Adds support for the Samsung PATA controller. This driver is based on
the
> > Libata subsystem and references the earlier patches sent for IDE
subsystem.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abhilash Kesavan<[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim<[email protected]>
> 
> Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <[email protected]>
> 
> Send it through the appropriate subsystem tree for this platform...

Hi,

You mean in my case, appropriate subsystem tree is ARM tree.
But I think, as Ben commented, it's better drivers go to upstream via the
driver's tree.
And of course, I read your comments about this like below...
'platform drivers do not build and/or work without additional platform
glue...'

Hmm.
I'm not sure which way is better...

Russell,

How do you think?
May I send this to your patch tracking system?
Or...how should I handle this?

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to