Wan ZongShun wrote: > > 2010/7/22 Atul Dahiya <[email protected]>: > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Wan ZongShun <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> 2010/7/21 Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>: > >> > From: Atul Dahiya <[email protected]> > >> > > >> > This Patch updates existing Samsung RTC driver for clock enabling > >> > support. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Atul Dahiya <[email protected]> > >> > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <[email protected]> > >> > --- > >> > drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c > >> > index 70b68d3..c032a15 100644 > >> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c > >> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c > >> > @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ > >> > /* drivers/rtc/rtc-s3c.c > >> > * > >> > + * Copyright (c) 2010 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. > >> > + * http://www.samsung.com/ > >> > + * > >> > * Copyright (c) 2004,2006 Simtec Electronics > >> > * Ben Dooks, <[email protected]> > >> > * http://armlinux.simtec.co.uk/ > >> > @@ -39,6 +42,7 @@ enum s3c_cpu_type { > >> > > >> > static struct resource *s3c_rtc_mem; > >> > > >> > +static struct clk *rtc_clk; > >> > static void __iomem *s3c_rtc_base; > >> > static int s3c_rtc_alarmno = NO_IRQ; > >> > static int s3c_rtc_tickno = NO_IRQ; > >> > @@ -431,6 +435,10 @@ static int __devexit s3c_rtc_remove(struct > platform_device *dev) > >> > s3c_rtc_setpie(&dev->dev, 0); > >> > s3c_rtc_setaie(0); > >> > > >> > + clk_disable(rtc_clk); > >> > + clk_put(rtc_clk); > >> > + rtc_clk = NULL; > >> > + > >> > iounmap(s3c_rtc_base); > >> > release_resource(s3c_rtc_mem); > >> > kfree(s3c_rtc_mem); > >> > @@ -488,6 +496,16 @@ static int __devinit s3c_rtc_probe(struct > platform_device *pdev) > >> > goto err_nomap; > >> > } > >> > > >> > + rtc_clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "rtc"); > >> > >> Do you really need the second argument? I think the bus clock for > >> a device should be findable with NULL for s3c platform.. > > > > No, actually clk_get() function for s3c platform searches on the > > basis of second parameter passed > > so need to pass the second argument here. > > Okay, good patch! > > Acked-by: Wan ZongShun <[email protected]> > Thanks for your review and ack.
As I asked to Alessandro, does this goes through what subsystem go to upstream? (snip) Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
